更多游戏:--------------------投稿时间排序视频热度排序全部原创一周一个月三个月按月份快速选择播放数播放数评论数收藏数硬币数弹幕数共 545 页/ 10885 个视频 1
没有更多信息本周播放数最高的视频广播电视节目制作经营许可证：（沪）字第1248号 网络文化经营许可证：沪网文[6号互联网ICP备案：沪ICP备号-3沪ICP证：沪B2-信息网络传播视听节目许可证：0910417CHARTS & TRENDS
& Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Quicklinks
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsreviewsuser ratingsmessage boardplot keywordsrelease dates
Awards & Reviews
Plot & Quotes
Did You Know?
Other Info
Promotional
External Links
Reviews & Ratings for
Chronological
Prolific Authors
Hide Spoilers:
5 reviews in total&
29 out of 35 people found the following review useful:
Difficult to watch, but still a great movie!
from Helsinki, Finland
22 May 2007
Not an easy piece of cinema to swallow, but still a great movie! Being a sort of a documentary-like this movie is not easy to watch. The
bloody scenes aren't easy to swallow, they are filmed in a very
realistic way.But still - this movie does not hold out anything. It shows the war the
way it really is - a very horrible event...Many didn't like this movie. Many have judged this one based on their
political believes. But argue or not this one shows what really
happened. Without withholding anything at all.It wouldn't be easy to find a copy of this one around these days. But
still if you get your hands on a copy of this movie - be sure not to
miss it! 10 points out of 10.
Was the above review useful to you?
20 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
The reality was terrible
from Russian Federation
13 August 2008
This ultra-naturalistic film about the assault of Grozny, but even
despite this reality was terrible.Facts over the brutal bullying of prisoners Russian soldiers have been
documented witnessed. &Purgatory& gives a relatively restrained and
correct picture without unnecessary details. Still, this is a film
about war, but not of torture. The fighting has shows not without
mistakes, but as we approach the reality, as far as possible. Nevzorov lack the means, so the movie was shot in style, reminiscent of
a movie rather low and art-house. But from this film only wins. Not
glossy and grim atmosphere on screen passes good mood of that war. It
was a terrible and ruthless war, and &Purgatory& can be described as
anti-war film. The protest against the carnage is visible in each
frame.Best film about the Chechen war.
Was the above review useful to you?
17 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
see it even without subtitles, a splendid film
from United States
17 September 2007
A terrific documentary drama very well done. The director himself was a
TV journalist at the scene at the time of the fighting depicted in the
film. I liked the brutalization rather than the family entertainment
kind of glamorization so often seen in war film that hold back because
of those who would complain of too much violence. The better we face
reality, the better we can deal with it. I know of no version with
subtitles but this should not keep anyone from seeing it. After reading
what I write here you should be able to follow along. NO SPOILERS here.
I am only starting it off so it can be understood, and I give away
nothing of what happens. The quote at the very beginning is from the
137th Psalm of which the last part goes like this: "O Daughter of
Babylon, doomed to destruction, blessed is he who repays you for what
you have done to us and he who seizes your infants and dashes them
against the rocks." Early January 1995 the Russians have entered Grozny
(capital of Chechnya). In the first scenes a military unit is pinned
down by unexpected fierce resistance at a hospital complex. They try
unsuccessfully to take away their wounded. The camera switches
constantly from one side to the other, and usually it is not difficult
to tell which is which. The Chechen side includes women snipers (from
the Baltics), black mercenaries (speaking in English), fighters in
Islamic headdress, and a pony-tailed commandeer. The Russian officer
(just lost one eye) seeks help by radio but keeps connecting to the
Chechen commandeer using a scanner to listen to Russian communications.
Killing, hate, blood, grime. The Russians pin hope on a tank. I have
spoiled nothing so far, and even if you do not understand Russian your
imagination should carry you along. Much effort went into this film.
Ten stars. P.S. I add this note April 2013. English subtitles - good
ones as well as one set of horrible ones - do exist but you need to
know where to look.
Was the above review useful to you?
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Russian "Apocalypse Now", plus gore minus the drama and suspense
from Nowhere special
21 August 2012
Another reviewer here called this movie "nationalist propaganda". One
has to understand that Nevzorov is s a cynical man by nature, who has
not just seen the war trough the tube but been there himself. He in his
own words remembers soldiers trying to hold their guts from falling out
with their own hands, the feeling of walking "on a carpet of casings"
and last but not least knowing and understanding the mentality and
psychology of both sides in the war - Chechen and Russian. Nevzorov is
neither friend or enemy of either sides, in his own words. This war
"nummed" him to nationalism, civil life etc. This movie can not be
called anything else but "demotivational", but nationalistic it's
absolutely not. Now to the movie itself: it's a horror show like no
other. It is perhaps too gory, but what else can be said of a film that
tries to condense a whole war into just over an hour's time. In the
movie there are no heroes - everyone alone with their truth, everyone
having a price to pay. The first Chechenya campaign was a bloody
failure, and that's what this movie tries to portray. No glorious "one
squad takes on an army" style American feelgoodism, no fancy happy end,
just a meaningless slaughter that is the war that could just as well be
called a civil war. The main characters is a team of Spetznaz and
chechen doctor turned field commander. The plot is very basic, but
based on real events. If it was taken too far or had some "blood icing"
put on this cake of misery, perhaps. But the movie stands out, despite
that, as a monument of Russian realism - balancing perfectly between
that and defeatism.
Was the above review useful to you?
6 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
Russian ultra-nationalist exploitation film
from Poland
26 January 2008
First of all, the other reviewers said things like &sort of a
documentary-like this movie&, &this one shows what really happened&,
and even a &terrific documentary drama&. This is completely wrong, as
this is a fictional story about fictional characters. In short, it's a
fiction - and it doesn't have a documentary feeling neither.The movie is utterly unrealistic portrayal of the possibly bloodiest
battle of Grozny of . Taking place in the biggest city in the
North Caucasus region, there is a complete absence of civilians
(thousands of which died, Russians and Chechens) - but there are, to
cite another reviewer, &women snipers (from the Baltics), black
mercenaries (speaking in English)& (both being Russian propaganda
myths). The Russian tank survives multiple RPG hits to be knocked-out
(after it fires many salvos despite the Chechen fighters standing in a
line like a firing squad carrying grenade launchers even before it
opens fire), but the Chechen tank is destroyed after being hit once.
There's not a single RPG-7 (&Chechen atom bomb&) in the movie, everyone
fire just a one-shot Mukha launchers. The Russians use ASG (heavy
automatic grenade launcher on a tripod) to shoot at people inside the
same building, few meters from them, just for a &cool& execution
(target being a man carrying a wounded). And so on.Chistilishche is a weird movie. It's full of strange, pointless gore
(like the Russian tank - there is only one such working in the movie -
driving back and forth on a Russian bodies in a long close-up scene),
but it's not an anti-war film. Writer and director Aleksandr Nevzorov
is a Russian ultra-nationalist and Duma deputy who supported this war
at the time when it was extremely unpopular. It's a grind-house
propaganda flick, like if John Wayne's Green Berets was made by Lucio
Fulci.In addition, not only Nevzorov tried to get all discredited myths into
one movie, he also helped to create new ones, which then circulated
further. To cite The Jamestown Foundation's review of a book The Wolves
of Islam: &The sensational tone of the book is set in the opening pages, which
warn that &graphic descriptions of terror, acts of torture, and human
cruelty in this book will disturb the reader.& Indeed, much of the
first half of the book is devoted to detailed descriptions of various
atrocities allegedly committed by Chechens. The author devotes some
space to a gruesome account of the crucifixion and mutilation of a
Russian soldier during the 1994 battle for Grozny. The &crucifixion of
the innocent soldier& is a recurring propaganda motif that dates back
to the Belgian front in the First World War (where the victim is
usually described as a Canadian soldier victimized by Germans). But the
author insists on the authenticity of his account, citing a scene from
a novel (though Murphy does not describe it as such) by Vyacheslav
Mironov and a similar scene from the 1997 movie Purgatory
(Chistilishche), made by Russian nationalist and Duma deputy Aleksandr
Nevzorov.&I find it unsettling this movie's user score is higher than of the
critically-acclaimed (Oscar- and Golden Globe-nominated) Kavkazskiy
plennik (Prisoner of the Mountains/Caucasus), which is a so much better
film about the same war.
Was the above review useful to you?
Related Links
Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet!
Follow IMDb on